TV shows asking people to play as a thief, stealing test passengers being criticized for visual violence

The establishment of the "Pan Wallet" was once questioned by Changsha citizens.

"Civic Hero" is naked visual violence

Yesterday (10th), the newspaper published a report on “The Civilian Heroes” Wuhan Bureau was set up by civilians “Paying Bricks”, which triggered heated discussion among readers and netizens. Some netizens turned up the last issue of “Civil Heroes” and found the audience. Netizens questioned the show not once a day or two. There are also official Weibo messages for the “civilian heroes” of Hunan Satellite TV, saying that this is “the wolf is coming”.

According to Yan Elegance, producer of the "Civic Heroes" column group, the second phase of the show was shot in Wuhan. The first program broadcast on May 1 was selected in Changsha. In this program, staff members deliberately “lost” a purse in a catering shop and a large supermarket, which contained more than 1,000 yuan in cash and various cards, cards, and business cards.

In the shooting, the column group uses multiple cameras hidden around the scene to shoot and observe the reaction of passersby after seeing the wallet. The host narrated and commented on the performance of the parties in the monitoring room.

In this video of the program, the reporter saw that a middle-aged man took the purse to the help desk and inspected the contents of the bag in front of the waiter. He also obtained the contact information and "lost owner" in the package. contact. When the “loser” claimed to be unwell on the phone and hoped that the man could send the wallet to another location, the man also agreed and then “lost the owner” back to the place of the incident to collect the property.

In stark contrast to this, someone on the show left the scene immediately after picking up the wallet. In the face of a “lost owner” who came back to retrieve his purse, one of the men actually took 200 yuan directly from his wallet and called it a “benefits” to the purse.

In the program which lasted less than half an hour, there were 26 passers-by appearing in the shots. Among them, 20 of them showed the virtues of picking up gold and 6 others had misconduct.

The reporter saw that many netizens had criticized the practice of setting up a “civilian hero” as early as May 1st. The netizen’s “civilian” left a message at 9 o’clock that evening. “How did the civilian hero go bad? The "Civic Heroes" aired on May 1, 2012 was really disappointing to me!" After the broadcast of the program, it has caused widespread questions.

After a search on the Internet, the reporter found that in the large-scale community websites such as Cat Fighting and Tianya, many netizens said that the program looked very "unmotivated," and it was suspected of teasing people. Some people also clearly stated that they would "boycott" this program.

The public asks: Why is the risky scenario placed in Wuhan?

Compared with Wuhan, the proportion of “good guys” in Changsha shows seems to be even greater, and many Wuhan citizens have raised objections. Some citizens said that the “good practice cost” is much greater than “identifying a thief” and “not collecting money”.

There are psychologists analyzing that in the second program, due to the greater potential risk brought by the confrontation with “thief”, the concerns of the parties are also more. "We can't simply make analogy based on the proportion of people, and then judge the quality of the citizens. This can reflect that Wuhan citizens have withstood more severe tests."

In a random interview with reporters, most Wuhan citizens expressed similar views. The 25-year-old Xiao Liu is even more blunt: “If I were to, I would definitely return the purse to the owner, at least to the nearest police station. But if I face thief theft, especially the kind of height in the show. Strong people, I really can't guarantee that I will be able to use my head."

In response, the program producer Yan elegantly stated that the selection of topics did not consider the level of risk.

When interviewed by this reporter, a citizen bluntly pointed out: "The hero of civilians" is a naked visual violence. Hunan Satellite TV, as an influential mass media, cannot ignore people's dignity and tear humanity. Bloody show before the public.

Bus drivers involved in recording: There are only 4 or 5 true passengers in the car

Yesterday, the reporter found Ruan Zhiyong, the 583 driver who participated in the recording of this program. Innocently, he also fell into the "query" whirlpool, and Master Tuo was a bit helpless. He told reporters: "I just cooperated with the company's requirements."

Master Zhai introduced that on April 22, he received a notice from the company asking him to cooperate with Hunan Satellite TV's "Civic Heroes" column production program. At 5 pm that day, he handed the car to the column group to install a camera. This installation work continued. It was 2 am the next day. The next day, Master Lu discovered that not only had more 3 or 4 cameras on the car, but even the original monitoring was connected with the recording equipment of the column group.

Master Yan told reporters that the program was recorded for two days and recorded the actions of more than 60 passengers. In order to meet the requirements of the column group “Keep only 4 to 5 real passengers in the car”, Master Yan had to follow other 583 road vehicles to stop and open the door when the front passengers were similar; in order to prevent passengers from playing The thief's actor, during the two days of the program's recording, there was a plainclothes police officer who had been following the car. "You can see that there was a well-prepared recording before."

The person in charge of the bus company owned by Road 583 told reporters that because the interview was led by the relevant department, all of them were obligated to cooperate and did not receive any money.

Netizen Spicy Review "Civic Heroes"

Jay-guoguo: There are many objective factors that are related to seeing the volunteers and their ability and security. Facts have proved that one half of the eyes or eyes to remind or stop directly, is not let Hunan Satellite TV disappointed? The key point is: How could a TV station not conduct an investigation on its own? What does it mean to come to Wuhan? Use tricks to verify the morality of a city. It also cuts out a few justice-suppressed parts. What is the default position for Wuhan?

Fei Xia Smile: I have been paying attention to this issue. When I look at the phenomenon in the show, I feel indignant about the incident. Why do the few men drop their eyes and turn a blind eye to it? But when the facts really happen around us, how many people will stand up? We can sometimes ask ourselves. We are not the incarnation of God. We must understand this! As far as the program is concerned, the public opinion of the media is ignored and there is a lack of control!

The quiet mountain scenery: it is worth reflecting on. A good-oriented truth is called beauty.

Another vest to continue microblogging: I would like to know, if the angry people hit the "thief" how to do? Should I say that I should say regret?

Wang Shijun in the South: This program made me feel uncomfortable. I could test anything and don't use entertainment testers.

Zhao Yongli: There are many television stations at home and abroad. They all like to engage in some mischiefs in public places, record the participants through candid shooting, and show the embarrassment of inertial thinking. For example, in the downtown area, fake glasses are hidden, and most people will smile after watching them. After reading this program, it was very heavy. If we want to promote justice, if I'm a director, I will only broadcast the picture of “just volunteering for the passengers”.

The concept of direct perception is: “To publicize social justice is the responsibility of the media, but the media itself cannot have a sense of moral superiority.” Well said, I feel that there is a breakthrough program, but whether it is the plot or the host The rhetoric of expression is too exaggerated and exaggerated. The motives that make people scorn their audiences are far greater than promoting social responsibility.

Lu Xilan: The nakedness of humanity is revealed by the camera without being noticed. It is publicly on the screen and full of violence.

Poly Real Estate Wuhan Co., Ltd.: The bottom line of entertainment cannot touch morality, and the media should maintain self-examination in the right to speak and credibility.

Wuhan City Association: Mass entertainment is indispensable, but it must not entertain the public.

Tail with a tail: I personally believe that Hunan Satellite TV is not deliberately targeting Wuhan. Of course, I believe that Hunan Satellite TV’s approach is mainly for ratings purposes rather than public morality.

Wu Shimin 1213: The Hunan media is a major province of entertainment, but its entertainment spirit cannot be based on the entertainment and moral standards. Instead, it should use a sense of social responsibility to guide the public. This kind of popular entertainment does not apply to this program.

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Prev: Senior Girls jump into the sea to commit suicide Two tourists rescued and sent them to the hospital