Imported SUV Copaci vs Colle proud

In urban SUVs, due to the lack of rich joint venture models, the prices and allocation strategies adopted by many imported cars are also close to that of joint venture vehicles, and the purchase value is not imaginary “without consideration”. For example, Kopag and Koreo belong to the "hot models" of imported urban SUVs. Although their monthly sales of more than 1,000 units are not comparable to domestic cars, they are quite good for imported cars. The commonality between Kopaq and Koreoi is not only this. For example, they have overlapping prices, all of which are linked to “non-Korean” brands but have a background in South Korea’s development and production. It is also because of this background that they have created a good price configuration. So, who can win in this "double" family competition?

General situation: There is a difference in the car configuration, and Koreo selects more aspects from the perspective of the car layout. The two cars are still different. Among them, if Kopaj plans to choose the "navigation" option, there are actually only two configuration combinations - five comfortable and seven luxury. On the contrary, Korei’s choice is even more numerous. There are two-wheel drive and four-wheel drive versions available, as well as up to five models. From the perspective of the model span, Koreo's starting price is a lot lower than that of Kopac, and the top-allocation configuration is also much higher than that of Kopachi, which is suitable for more consumer choices. Of course, Kopacz lost in the type of car, and it is only related to the domestic version of Kopaca.

There is not much preference for the two car markets. The reformed Kompaci has just been listed, and many places have not arrived yet. There is no way to talk about discounts. Kolei proud because of popularity, distribution volume is not enough, the market discount rate is not much, cash discounts are generally lower than 5,000 yuan or even not. In some areas, there is a discount of 5000-10000 yuan. Of course, the actual gold content of the gift package cannot be compared with cash.

Design and space: both have a good affinity, Kepaqi larger two cars belong to their own brands for the global, especially the Asian market models launched, so there are some common in product design, for example, will not be reflected too much Their own brand culture, style has been modest, the main stream. Among them, Korey proud, although in the headlights and in the details of the network to create Renault style, but the vehicle outline is purely Asian-style, or even purely Korean-style, there is no Renault models personality and alternative. Compared with Kopaca, the body outline design is a bit mediocre. Fortunately, the change in profile, the addition of big mouth nets and new headlights, added some sports and sharp feelings.

In terms of interiors, Koleos also showed some of the ideas of Renault's designers. Not only did the design elements reflect more Renault features, but they were also more similar to Renault cars in terms of storage space and ergonomics. Kopaqi is still the routine in this respect, and all the main demands are in the mainstream. Of course, the change of the interior of the upgrade is still worthy of recognition, such as the "nostalgic" green instrument has finally changed, the screen layout in front of the console, the operating platform of the small platform, and mobile cup holder, etc. The design is very worthy of recognition.

Copaci was more proud and prodigious than Kore, and with the difference in style, it actually showed the characteristics of the American car in terms of visual impact - it looked much bigger than Klein. However, this does not mean that Koppich is proud of one level higher than Kore, the width of the two vehicles is similar, and the wheelbase difference is not obvious. From the perspective of space, the two cars have little difference in the front row feeling. The rear row is a standard five seat layout, and the space sense is slightly better than that of Kopaci. Of course, the third row of seats that Captiva has, is that Koley can't match.

In addition to the third-row seats, the Copaci's size advantage is reflected in the luggage compartment volume. Note the data in the table, the folding seats are not the same. That is to say, in the case of five people, the volume of Captiva is 942L, and Koleos is 450L. Although from actual performance, Kopachi's baggage compartment volume is not as large as this degree, but it definitely belongs to the category "can be installed" in urban SUVs. Kelei proud of the luggage compartment load is a law-abiding, much smaller than the volume of many Japanese joint venture SUV.

However, Kore proud also has its own unique features in the design of luggage compartments, that is, the use of the upper and lower split tailgate design is not common in similar models. The advantage is self-evident: usually lighter and more convenient to take things, while the tail part of the downturn can also be used as a temporary seat. Kopacchi did a good job of "conveniently handling things." Its rear windshield could be turned on alone, but it wouldn't be enough to get a temporary seat.